Page E-A-T Profile
0-100 score + A/F grade on 7 E-A-T signals objectively detectable from HTML: author, dates, authority citations, schema, publisher transparency, social presence, HTTPS.
URL to score
Also worth exploring
All toolsMeasure your English text readability: Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog, long sentences, lexical diversity, complex words. Calibrate tone to your audience.
Extract title, meta description, H1 and H2 from up to 50 pages at once. Ideal for auditing the editorial consistency of a category or a competitor.
Measure whether the gap between two variants (titles, layouts, snippets) is statistically significant. Two-proportion Z-test with p-value and confidence interval.
Is your page ready for AI Overviews and ChatGPT Search? FAQ/HowTo schema, Q&A pattern, lists, direct answer, brand mentions — score 0-100.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly is E-A-T? +
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness, the 4 dimensions Google's Quality Raters use to evaluate a page (Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines, public document). E-A-T is not a direct algorithmic score, but feeds several signals: content quality for YMYL (Your Money Your Life), weight of review aggregators, editorial authority signals. In practice, a bad E-A-T profile means an indirect penalty on sensitive queries (health, finance, legal).
Which signals are scored? +
7 objective signals detectable from HTML: (1) identified author, rel="author", Person schema, byline classes (20 pts); (2) publication / modification dates, schema datePublished+dateModified, time[datetime] (15 pts); (3) citations to authority sources, .gov, .edu, Wikipedia, AFP, INSEE, etc. (20 pts); (4) Article schema JSON-LD (15 pts); (5) About / Contact / Legal page (10 pts); (6) social presence, sameAs + social links (10 pts); (7) HTTPS (10 pts). Total /100.
What we do NOT measure? +
Several E-A-T dimensions are impossible to score from HTML: external reputation (brand mentions, third-party reviews), the author's real expertise (CV, publications), editorial quality of the content (Google uses a language model for that), behavioral signals (dwell time, pogo-sticking from SERP). This tool only measures what is objectively declarable in HTML, and many pages already fail on these basics.
My score is low but I rank anyway, is it serious? +
E-A-T matters most on YMYL queries (health, finance, legal, safety). On less sensitive topics (cooking, lifestyle, mainstream tech), an average E-A-T score gets by. But the market is evolving: since the Helpful Content Update 2022 and its iterations, Google uses E-A-T as a proxy for "site worth recommending" on more and more verticals. Score < 50 means concrete risk at the next core update, even outside YMYL.
Actually buying backlinks?
Our network catalog is browsable without signup. Publisher pricing shown, no commission, no middleman.