Lazy-load Above the Fold
Detects lazy-loading images visible immediately on screen (header, hero, first illustrations). Classic cause of a degraded LCP.
URL to scan
Also worth exploring
All toolsTest your robots.txt against 18 user-agents: Googlebot, Bingbot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Applebot and other AI crawlers. Path × bot matrix.
Verify your hreflang tags: valid ISO codes, reciprocity between language versions, x-default, conformance with Google's recommendations.
Inspect HTTP response headers: x-robots-tag, cache-control, HSTS, link, vary, server. SEO + security annotations on impactful headers.
Validate your sitemap.xml: structure, URL count, lastmod outliers, sitemap-index recursion. Conforms to sitemaps.org and Google.
Frequently asked questions
Why is lazy-load above the fold harmful? +
Native lazy-loading (loading="lazy") asks the browser to wait for the image to enter the viewport before downloading it. On an image visible immediately (logo, hero, first illustration), this delays LCP (Largest Contentful Paint, one of the critical Core Web Vitals). Google has documented that a bad LCP costs SERP positions. The rule: no lazy-load above the fold, lazy-load everywhere below.
How does the tool detect without rendering the page? +
3-criteria heuristic. First, source order position, the first 5 images are almost always above the fold on desktop. Second, structural context, images inside <header>, <nav>, or the first 5,000 characters of <main>. Third, class names, hero, cover, banner, above-fold, jumbo, featured-img... Any image with loading="lazy" matching one of these criteria is flagged.
What is the correct config? +
For images above the fold: loading="eager" (default, can be omitted) plus fetchpriority="high" (forces the browser to download them with priority, typical LCP gain of 200-500 ms). For images below the fold: loading="lazy". And always: width and height set on every <img> to avoid CLS (layout shift).
My images have Tailwind/Bootstrap classes, does the tool still match? +
As long as your class names contain the classic SEO patterns (hero, cover, banner...), yes. For more exotic frameworks (utility-only without semantic names), we fall back on heuristics 1 and 2 (position plus structural context). If all your images are named img-1, img-2, the tool flags the first 5 and those in the header, which covers 90% of real cases.
Actually buying backlinks?
Our network catalog is browsable without signup. Publisher pricing shown, no commission, no middleman.